HEGEMONI LABA AKUNTANSI DALAM ETIKA BISNIS (KRITIK ANTONIO GRAMSCI)

Authors

  • Nurdina Universitas PGRI Adi Buana Surabaya
  • R. Yudi Sidharta Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi Indonesia Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55732/unu.gnk.2020.02.2.1

Keywords:

Gramsci's hegemony, accounting profit, business ethics

Abstract

This article uses Antonio Gramsci's hegemonic thinking to critically examine accounting earnings within the framework of business ethics. In the realm of accounting, critical scientists offer a new view as an alternative that can radically replace various current modes of accounting practice, especially aspects of injustice that are generated or supported by accounting. The practical view sees business as a purely profit making activity, even if profit is considered the sole main purpose of business. Currently there are concerns from many parties in Indonesia that the phenomenon of unethical business methods will develop. There is even an assumption that unethical business practices are legal, if you want to gain the maximum profit or profit according to economic principles. This paper aims to arouse our awareness that business success is not only determined by company profits and growth. The perpetuation of capitalist domination in accounting is supported by traditional intellectuals who use their hegemony in spreading these capitalist values.Therefore, counter-hegemony is needed as mentioned by Gramsci, namely organic intellectuals to free the people from the domination of hegemony of capitalism.

References

Anderson, R. H. 1976. Selecting AndDeveloping Media For Instruction:American society for training anddevelopment.Madison, WI, NewYork: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Bungin, B. 2003.Analisis Data PenelitianKualitatif: Pemahaman Filosofis danMetodologis ke Arah PenguasaanModel Aplikasi.Cetakan Pertama.Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Caccese, Michael,S, 1997. Ethics andFinancial Analyst. Journal ofFinancial Analysis, Januari/February.Dian.2007.Menuju Pandangan Duniayang Holistik, (online),

Djamhuri, A. 2014. Akuntansi PerspektifKritis: Suatu Pengantar. PertemuanMasyarakat AkuntansiMultiparadigma Indonesia (TEMAN)I. Fakultas Ekonomi dan BisnisUniversitas Brawijaya.Malang.

Estes, R. 2005.Tyranny of the BottomLine: Why Corporations Make GoodPeople Do Bad Things.AlihBahasaIndonesia Nur Basuki Rachmanto.Jakarta: Gramedia PustakaUtama.

Fiol, C.M. 1989.A Semiotic Analysis ofCorporate Language: OrganizationalBoundaries and Joint Venturing.Administrative Science Quarterly(34): 277-303.

Fischer, P.E. dan Stocken, P.C. 2001.Imperfect Information and CredibleCommunication.Journal ofAccounting Research39 (1): 119-134.

Gramsci, Antonio.2013.PrisonNotebooks; Catatan-catatan dariPenjara,Terj. Teguh Wahyu Utomo.Pustaka Pelajar.Yogyakarta.

Irianto, Gugus. 2006. Dilema “Laba” danRerangka Teori Political Economy ofAccounting (PEA).TEMA (JurnalAkuntansi, Auditing, dan SistemInformasi),7 (2).

Lee, Chong Yeong danYoshihara,Heideki, 1997. BusinessEthics of Korea and Japanesemanager. Journal of BusinessEthics16: 7-21.Li, D.H. 1972. The Semantic Aspect ofCommunication Theory andAccountancy.Journal of AccountingResearch10 (2) Autumn: 102-107.

Molisa, P.B.M.2014. Accounting forApocalypse (AThesis). VictoriaUniversity of Wellington.

Riduwan, Akhmad. 2012.Realitas DalamCermin Retak: Laba AkuntansiDalam Bingkai Penafsiran PraktisiBisnis Non-Akuntan (StudiHermeneutika-Kritis).SimposiumNasional Akuntansi Xv Banjarmasin2012.

Sawarjuono, T. 2005. PendidikanAkuntansi dan Perempuan: DariIdeologi Patriarki ke PraktikPemujaan Tubuh.JAAI.9 (2).

Schmidt, D.J. 2007. Speaking ofLanguage: On The Future ofHermeneutics.Research inPhenomenology 37: 271-284.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-17

How to Cite

Nurdina, & Sidharta, R. Y. . (2020). HEGEMONI LABA AKUNTANSI DALAM ETIKA BISNIS (KRITIK ANTONIO GRAMSCI). GREENOMIKA, 2(2), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.55732/unu.gnk.2020.02.2.1

Issue

Section

Articles