PRAGMATIC FAILURE ISSUE: STUDENTS’ FAILURE TO RESPOND AN INVITING POLITELY

Rahmatul Khasanah

Abstract


The present study is conducted to investigate how non English department students produce pragmatic failures in responding the expressions, how do non English department students successfully respond to the pragmatics in responding to the expression and how do non English department students repair their pragmatic failure in responding the expressions. As the data analysis, the students’ answers of questionnaires and students’ answers of interviews are taken. This study uses descriptive qualitative method to analyze and interpret the results of questionnaires and interviews. The researcher believes that by studying the questionniares’ answers of non English department students and observing the students’ answers during interviews can answer the research questions. Pragmatic failures are the failure of non English department students to understand the intended meaning of some expressions. There are two kinds of pragmatic failures which produced by non English department students to respond the expressions are pragmalinguistic failures and sociopragmatic failures. From data analysis of producing pragmatic failures of non English department students, most of students fail to respond to the given contexts politely. Implicitly, the more they fail to respond the context, the more they produce sociopragmatic failures.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abbe, A., Gulick, L.M.V., & Herman, J.L. (2007). Cross-cultural competence in Army leaders: A conceptual and empirical foundation. Washington D.C: U.S. Army Research Institute.

Brown, R., and S, Levinson. 1978. "Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena." Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction. ed. E. N. Goody, PP. 56 - 289. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cutting, Joan. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.

Dornyei, Zoltan. 2003. Questionnaire in Second Language Research: Constructing, Administration and Processing. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, Publisher.

Dornyei, Zoltan. (2009). The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jianbin, Zheng Lihui and Huang. (2010). A Study of Chinese EFL learners' Pragmatic Failure and the Implications for College English Teaching. Polyglossia, 18(Pragmatic Failures), 14.

Horn, Laurence R. and Gregory Ward. 2006. The Handbook of Pragmatics. UK: Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.

Jingwei, Ting. 2013. “Analysis Pragmatic Failure from the Perspective of Adaptation”, Cross Cultural Communication, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2013.

Jucker, Andreas H and Irma Taavitsainen. 2008. Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company.

Komorowska, Hanna. (2014). Awareness in Action the role of consciousness in language acquisition (A. Lyda & K. Szsesniak Eds.). Poland: Springer International Publisher.

Krathwohl, D.R., Bloom, B.S.,, & Masia, B.B. (1973). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: McKay Co., Inc.

Lihui, Zheng and Huang Jianbin. 2010. “A Study of Chinese EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Failure and The Implications for College English Teaching”, Polyglossia, Vol.18, 2010.

Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). The Handbook of Pragmatics. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Ming-Yan Li, Zhuang Yan. 2010. “Reflection on the Nature of Pragmatic Failure”, US-China Foreign Language, Vol. 8, No. 1 (Serial No. 76), 2010.

Salmani, Mohammad Ali. 1995. A Socio-Pragmatic Comparative Study of Ostensible Invitations in English and Farsi. Unpublished Thesis. Farsi: University of Isfahan

Thomas, Jenny. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failures. Applied linguistics, 4(pragmatic failure), 110.

Ting, Cheng. 2007. A Study of Pragmatic Failures in English Majors. Unpublished article. China: Xiaogan University.

Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics (2 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yule, George. (2006). The Study of Language (3 ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.